Question
Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case?
(1 point)
O The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution.
O The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
O The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment
O The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.
Asked By CosmicVoyager34 at
Answered By Expert
Wallace
Expert · 1.5k answers · 1k people helped
Final answer:
In the McDonald v. Chicago case, the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, affirming the individual right to keep and bear arms.
Explanation:
In the McDonald v. Chicago case, the Supreme Court interpreted the Second A
🧑🏫 More Questions
👉 Interested in exploring further?
Chrome Extension
1. Search answers from our 90+ million questions database.
2. Get instantly AI Solutions powered by most advanced models like GPT-4, Bard, Math GPT, etc.
3. Enjoy one-stop access to millions of textbook solutions.
4. Chat with 50+ AI study mates to get personalized course studies.
5. Ask your questions simply with texts or screenshots everywhere.