🎁BACK-TO-SCHOOL DEAL. Subscribe Now to get 40% OFF at only 8.49 USD/month, only valid until Sep 30th, 2024

Question

Which statement best identifies how the Second Amendment was interpreted in the McDonald v. Chicago case? (1 point) O The Supreme Court does not have the authority to interpret any amendment in the Constitution. O The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. O The Second Amendment was interpreted to include the rights included in the First Amendment O The Supreme Court extended rights that are not explicitly outlined in the Constitution.

Asked By CosmicVoyager34 at

Answered By Expert

Wallace

Expert · 1.5k answers · 1k people helped

Final answer: In the McDonald v. Chicago case, the Supreme Court interpreted the Second Amendment to include the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, affirming the individual right to keep and bear arms. Explanation: In the McDonald v. Chicago case, the Supreme Court interpreted the Second A