Question
Asked By FrostBite26 at
Answered By Expert
Bernard
Expert Ā· 3.2k answers Ā· 3k people helped
Solution By Steps
Step 1: Main Idea
Georgia responded to Brown v. Board of Education by employing strategies to resist desegregation.
Step 2: Support with Evidence
Georgia passed laws to maintain segregation, such as the āMassive Resistanceā policy and the āInterposition Resolution.ā
Step 3: Explain Your Evidence
These actions show Georgiaās intent to defy federal desegregation orders, indicating a strategy of resistance rather than compliance. The strategies were largely unsuccessful in preventing desegregation in the long term.
Step 4: Wrap Up Your Argument
Georgiaās strategies, including legislative resistance, demonstrated a firm stance against desegregation. However, they ultimately proved ineffective in halting the progress towards integration mandated by Brown v. Board of Education.
Final Answer
Georgia responded to Brown v. Board of Education with strategies aimed at resisting desegregation, notably through legislative measures like the āMassive Resistanceā policy and the āInterposition Resolution.ā
Key Concept
Desegregation Resistance
Key Concept Explanation
States like Georgia employed strategies, such as legislative resistance, to oppose desegregation efforts mandated by Brown v. Board of Education, despite the ultimate failure of these tactics in preventing integration.
š§āš« More Questions
š Interested in exploring further?
Chrome Extension
1. Search answers from our 90+ million questions database.
2. Get instantly AI Solutions powered by most advanced models like GPT-4, Bard, Math GPT, etc.
3. Enjoy one-stop access to millions of textbook solutions.
4. Chat with 50+ AI study mates to get personalized course studies.
5. Ask your questions simply with texts or screenshots everywhere.