Answer

D

Explanation

This question inquires about the reason behind the increase in US manufacturing. Option A suggests that the increase was due to a boycott of British goods, which could have potentially led to a surge in domestic production as alternatives to British goods were sought. Option B proposes that the rise was a result of increased demand for goods, implying a more general market-driven growth. Option C posits that the increase happened because of decreased demand for goods, which would typically lead to a decrease in manufacturing rather than an increase. Option D states that tariffs on imported goods led to the rise in US manufacturing, suggesting a protectionist policy aimed at bolstering domestic production.To determine the correct answer, we need to assess the plausibility and historical context of each option. Option A could be plausible if there was indeed a significant boycott of British goods during the specified period. However, without further context, it's challenging to ascertain the validity of this claim. Option B seems reasonable, as increased demand for goods typically leads to increased manufacturing to meet that demand. Option C appears less likely, as decreased demand would usually lead to a decrease in manufacturing activity. Option D suggests a protectionist measure that could have indeed led to an increase in domestic manufacturing by reducing competition from imported goods.Considering the historical context and economic principles, option D, "US. manufacturing increased because of tariffs on imported goods," seems the most plausible. Tariffs on imported goods could have incentivized domestic production by making imported goods more expensive relative to domestically produced goods, thereby boosting manufacturing activity within the US.