🎁BACK-TO-SCHOOL DEAL. Subscribe Now to get 40% OFF at only 8.49 USD/month, only valid until Sep 30th, 2024

Question

Question
Much of the anti-Japanese feeling in the United States in the 1920s was in California. The opposition included California labor organizations. Why would California workers be against Japanese immigration? Why does the headline in the Japan Times and Mail call the Senate vote a "Declaration of War"? Seventeen years after this vote and this article, Japan attacked the United States at Pearl Harbor. Is there a possible connection between the Immigration Quota Act of 1924 and Pearl Harbor? Explain. 02018 The Deo Priec: Teachers may pholocopy his page for their own cleasrooms. Digta reproduction 315

Asked By at

Answered By Expert

Expert · 1.0k answers · 1k people helped

Answer

1. California workers would be against Japanese immigration due to economic competition for jobs.2. The headline in the Japan Times and Mail calls the Senate vote a "Declaration of War" because it was seen as a hostile act towards Japan.3. There could be a possible connection between the Immigration Quota Act of 1924 and Pearl Harbor, as the act may have fostered a hostile environment towards Japan.

Explanation

1. The anti-Japanese sentiment in California during the 1920s was primarily due to economic competition. Many Japanese immigrants were willing to work for lower wages, which threatened the livelihoods of local workers. This led to opposition from labor organizations.2. The headline in the Japan Times and Mail calling the Senate vote a "Declaration of War" likely refers to the Immigration Quota Act of 1924, which severely restricted Japanese immigration to the United States. This act was seen as a hostile act towards Japan, hence the headline.3. The Immigration Quota Act of 1924 and the attack on Pearl Harbor are connected in the sense that the act fostered a hostile environment towards Japan, which may have contributed to the negative perception of Japan in the United States. This hostility could have been a factor in the U.S.'s reaction to the attack. However, it's important to note that the connection is not direct, and there were many other factors at play in the lead-up to Pearl Harbor.

🧑‍🏫 More Questions

Select the CORRECT statement below. The National Response Framework: A. Is a Federal Policy requiring only local agencies to adopt. B. Serves only federal agencies C. Describes key roles and responsinWies for integrating capabilties across the whole community. D. Is applied during natural disasters only. The term "response" as used in the National Response Framework includes: A. Actions to save lives, protect property and the environment, stabilize communities, and meet basic human needs following an incident. B. Actions of private sector entities responsible for critical infrastructure but not actions of public service agencies. C. Actions of Federal Responders prior to the actions of local responders. D. Actions that relate to only to the emergency responders. How the Federal Government aligns resources and delivers core capabilities to reach our shared National Preparedness Goal is described in: A. The Response Federal Interagency Operational Plan B. The Strategic Information and Operations Center C. The National Operations Center D. Science and Technology Which of the following is a benefit of Unified Command? A. Multiple Jurisdictions acting independently B. Joint Priorities C. National Incident Management System D. Whole Community Why is it important to engage communities in preparedness efforts? A. We DO NOT engage communities in preparedness efforts B. Preparedness efforts should be done at the highest jurisdictional level C. Groups are atways bound by geographic boundaries D. Provide opportunities for sharing information